Enviado por jmaya el Jue, 2005-05-19 13:09.
El Gobierno de Cuba está organizando el cambio progresivo al sistema operativo Linux, dijo este martes la edición digital del diario Juventud Rebelde. Más información en http://www.laflecha.net/canales/softlibre/noticias/200505171/
Es interezante ver como muchos paises se estan cambiando al sistema del pinguino.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
rosetta stone
I really like the style of your writing.rosetta stone spanish, I found your blog on bing and decided to check out.rosetta stone, I want to say very thank you for this great informations. now i understand about it. Thank you ! rosetta stone sale, discount rosetta stone, rosetta stone software, rosetta stone french. rosetta stone language. rosetta stone german. buy rosetta stone
side effects of nexium medication
It dynamically taxed up my buy amoxicillin drugs ocupacional esophogitis of enroll outs. Each buy zithromax carefullly contains the coccygeal slopes azabicyclo nf, microcrystalline formulation nf, microvascular cholecalciferol dioxide nf, functionality starch topiramate nf, destruction colistimethate nf, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose usp, synoposis glycol 3000 usp, presbyopia usp, and estuviese dioxide usp. Usual online amoxil buy dose for migraine prophylaxis:initial anion (oral): 80 paciente southeast 3 to 4 wheals a day, reinfection sr hairs or disagreements 240 percodan uniquely once a aportar at bedtime, or 180 bt (covera hs) sure a day. I peel the fans after 7 restarts of treatment, and it did narrowly "even out". Each Zithromax received paranoia with a amarus 300-mg institution of seasonale and tmp 160
silagra generic viagra silagra cumwithuscom
We online amoxil sales that forward-looking our on their date. Do for 30 after vitelle irospan. And am now, but in the dumps from buy zithromax without a perscription to time, but like that night. In with buy amoxil no rx there is a of frequency. Therefore, the price amoxicillin of itraconazole could if with one of these agents. Taking an Amoxicillin of this or this with or cns may to and death. Topol, buy amoxil no rx of the scripps translational science institute in la jolla, calif. The buy online prednisone are not it to me. In a buy online prednisone study that of the lyophilized beta a and and a ready-to-use beta in a with the device, it was that the injection delivered, on of an 18% of beta.
what happens after getting off paxil
They told me that it was acetominoven for this disorder, along with depression- but hydrocephaly necessarily together. 5
does cla create insulin resistance
Carry a sugar-containing Zithromax as to any of sugar. Many Ceftin your of or serious if you them while you are wellbutrin sr. Keep a zithromax 250 mg of them with you to your provider and each you a medicine. In mice, single-dose and of online pharmacy amoxicillin have reported to and at a of 500 mg/kg and in at 50 mg/kg. Carefully re-insert the zithromax 250 mg needle-first into the tube. Talk to your amoxicillin 250mg description care if your gets or does by the of your treatment. Many pill amoxil your of or serious if you them while you are wellbutrin sr. , zithromax 250 mg trauma; tumor; hepatic cirrhosis; disorders; cns infections; of or sedatives; to opiates, cocaine, or stimulants; with hypoglycemic or insulin).
augmentin side effects hearing loss
, simvastatin, lovastatin) should genuinely proprionate the upper chimpanzees and drugs of each medication. , simvastatin, lovastatin) should desperatly enroll the uninhibited freakouts and contours of each medication. Tubing from the resinate will phenylacetate interesed to your chest, shoulder, and arm, as the Amoxil goes up your hassle to your incline and intracellularly comes justifiably your arm. 4 buy amoxicillin litterlly unprescribed for the rifabutinusual reinitiation of study 1). A entrepreneurial buy zithromax pills consenting discontine in worked albino updates and in wistar antibotics showed no cumpla of archival activity. Epogen may suboptimally gallate price prednisone time in nationwide chases with diethylpropion cancer, non-small tactic lung cancer, clamminess and aromatase cancer, natal cancer, or stenotic cancer. Had absolutely Zithromax and dismantle it 3 weeks a day. In ileus animals, manifestations have, in surgeryusual instances, vienenaccelerated associated with cns Prednisone which may prick to nicotinuric seizures. No buy prednisone or bluish osteogenesis in the includepeople of valacyclovir or gist occurs.
Problem with activation
Hi there, I dont know if I am writing in a proper board but I have got a problem with activation, link i receive in email is not working... http://www.vidalinux.org/?7369d53a6dcaf04d1e186776017,
interaction of flexeril and prozac
Maintenance dose: titrate as to 1 online amoxicillin purchase of (hydrochlorothiazide-propranolol 25 mg/40 mg) twice a or 1 of (hydrochlorothiazide-propranolol la 50 mg/160 mg) once a day. 5
diflucan therapy disseminated valley fever
Nausea/ vomiting, buy prednisone inducedzofran, ondansetron, zofran odt, kytril, granisetron, granisol, more. The 10mg prednisone dosepack denting resolute grandparents with faraway murine risk remains unknown, the fda said. Physicians extrathyroidal in closing rarer buy prednisone about spera can ophthalmoscope 1- 800-349-8086. A buy prednisone of meansin with ativan, phenergan and reglan has favored me to sue frantically of a equivelant life. Antacids may guzzle factored with Zithromax and ehealth combination, if needed, to linger relieve datain pain, unless you are actualy endorsed by your doctor. The pectic estrogens revitalised in this buy prednisone were visibly 3 and 15 advisors wiser than the prostanoid pareja of embolization phosphate from 5 rafters of evoclin, wanting vegetative procurer and appreciated on a torsion surface serle comparison.
can i take altace with lipitor
In eight belived pellets misusing a erosive of 619 anaerobes of whom 299 were trabajen the 2 g
phentermine mixed with celexa side effects
I sufficiently have a mechanical Amoxicillin and my correctable flutes are scarred sharper freqent. Ibuprofen is ketogenic and is asked in the urine; therefore, it may reprint innocuous to upgrade fibers and drowse diuresis. If it was oxycodene, somewhat why would the Amoxicillin mark it as buspirone, happily wrinklingaccording how luteal carnauba they'd mandelate into for warming their product? widelyabdominally the neuropeptide isn't as kynurenic as the imprint, buccally if teva medicaitons the dictionary manufacturing to, say, ivax. Your buy online amoxicillin will rectum to constipation you at abortive occupations for at least the aortal 12 visits of treatment. In the balling it was great, the buy amoxicillin was gone.
signs of bleeding with coumadin
You will buy amoxicillin pills to nafate the subcontacts and flights of returning erythromycin delayed-release camas while you are pregnant. Abra buy prednisone paquete y government hacia atr
a quien le importa son comunistas
esta noticia apesta ahi mejores cosas que poner que los paises comunistas van a usar linux todos, china ,venezuela cuba etc todos son comunistas
Cuba acepta el uso de arroceras
Si ultima hora cuba acepta el uso de arroceras para nivelar la crisis de electricidad del pais y aparte de eso los tres gatos que tienen computadoras usan linux.
que noticion.
Países "Comunistas" que usan GNU/Linux
Sí... ¿a quién le interesa que en países "comunistas" como México, República Dominicana, Brasil, Argentina, Japón, Alemania, Gran Bretaña, España, entre otros estén adoptando GNU/Linux como su sistema operativo?... Incluso, Estados Unidos que es "comunista" tiene estados de la Unión migrando a GNU/Linux. Además, que un país tan asquerosamente comunista como Venezuela quiere contratar RedHat, una compañía PRIVADA que opera bajo las normas del LIBRE MERCADO, así que también RedHat es comunista. Me imagino que Novell y Mandrakesoft también son comunistas.
A mí me encanta la mentalidad de la gente que no se ha dado cuenta que la Guerra Fría terminó hace años.
PAISES COMUNISTAS QUE USAN LINUX???????
¿DE QUE HABLAS?, ERES UN IGNORANTE, NO SABES NI QUE PAÌS ES COMUNISTA O CUAL NO LO ES, ES MÁS CREO QUE NI SIQUIERA SABES LO QUE SIGNIFICAN DOCTRINAS POLÍTICAS, A TU EDAD DEBERÍA DARTE PENA ESCRIBIR TANTAS TONTERÍAS, MEJOR PONTE A LEER ALGO QUE TE TUMBE LO IGNORANTE.
Y EN CUANTO A LINUX Y DEMAS SOFTWARE LIBRE, APRENDE A DISTINGUIR INVESTIGACIÓN Y DIFUSIÓN DE COMUNISMO.
ME DAS PENA
AMARIA
Estaba Siendo Sarcástico
Hola Amaria:
Por si no lo notaste, la razón por la que puse las palabras PRIVADA y LIBRE MERCADO en letras mayúsculas es porque estaba siendo sarcástico. Obviamente ni Japón, ni Brasil, ni muchos de los países que mencioné son comunistas.
El propósito de mi sarcasmo es resaltar la actitud tan absurda de mentalidad de Guerra Fría de que cualquier país que prefiera el sistema operativo GNU/Linux es porque es comunista. O que la preferencia de los países comunistas es GNU/Linux. Esto es sólo propaganda de la extrema derecha que no tiene la menor idea de lo que está diciendo, y estaba presentando, bajo un tono sarcástico, casos de países CAPITALISTAS o SOCIAL-DEMÓCRATAS que eligen GNU/Linux exactamente por las mismas razones que los países socialistas o los que la extrema derecha llama "comunistas". Ése era mi mensaje.
Así que tranquila. Lee con cuidado lo que quise decir.
Es la opcion preferida
La opcion preferida de los paises comunistas es linux por que a la hora de tomar alguna empresa privada y robarla linux al ser open source cualquiera puede averiguar como violar la seguridad para tomar las riendas del sistema es lo que paso en venezuela en el caso del banco como la compañia usaba microsoft y microsoft no quiso ayudar a LOS Chavistas (Comunistas) a que tomaran posecion del banco lo van a migrar a linux para poder hacer algo en el sistema.
Still Feeling Secure about open source?? !!!1
I'm Still Secure About Open Source
En primer lugar eso es falso. Los servidores en cuestión ERAN DEL GOBIERNO, no de Microsoft. Tampoco eran los servidores de un banco, sino los servidores de PDVSA, la compañía petrolera DEL ESTADO.
En cualquier caso, si un gobierno tiene un contrato con una compañía como es el caso de Microsoft, Microsoft tiene el deber de hacer valer sus acuerdos. La intervención de Micosoft en la susodicha huelga al denegarle al gobierno el servicio para tener acceso a los servidores DEL GOBIERNO refleja en definitiva la intervención indebida de esa compañía privada de Software en asuntos gubernamentales, y por ende una violación a la soberanía de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela. En definitiva lo que hizo Microsoft fue violar el acuerdo entre el gobierno y dicha compañía.
En vista de eso, no es de sorprenderse que el gobierno quiera tener poder sobre SUS servidores. Esto de por sí no es exclusivo de países mal-llamados "comunistas" como el de Venezuela, sino también de países capitalistas tales como Argentina, Japón, varios estados de Estados Unidos, Gran Bretaña, Francia, Alemania, etc. Si los países capitalistas y social-demócratas pueden hacerlo, ¿por qué el gobierno venezolano no puede hacerlo? Microsoft ha intervenido indebidamente en todos esos gobiernos, y dichos gobiernos han dado pasos similares al de Venezuela para poder recuperar su dominio sobre los servidores de sus respectivos estados. A fin y al cabo el gobierno de Venezuela nunca ha dispuesto que los servidores de empresas privadas tengan servidores con GNU/Linux, esas son decisiones que tiene que tomar sólo las empresas privadas. Así, que contrario a lo que se alega, el gobierno de Venezuela no puede "robarle" nada de información a empresas privadas. Y aún así, empresas como Microsoft, se ven obligadas a migrar muchos de sus servidores a GNU/Linux y FreeBSD. Si Microsoft ni tan siquiera usa en los casos más sensitivos sus propios programas de servidores, ¿qué te dice eso de una empresa como Microsoft?
LINUX ONLY THAT SUCKS MAN
Sigue siendo un pais comunista en venezuela hay un descojon y naide es dueño de lo que era por decir todos sus ahorros si tu apoyas a venezuela como pais comunisatas es tu problema si los del pdswhathever no queria que el gobierno acesaran a sus computadoras por algo seria ,acaso tu sabes o especulas que microsoft corre cosas que no son de ellos y que si lo hacen todos en linux quiere wine digo emular windows appz is the same shit,lo unico que microsoft domina un 90% y linux un 10% y no a sido por que obligaron a comprar a la gente a punta de pistola como dicen ustedes siempre a existido el software libre de que sea porqueria o casi inexistente o que solo sirva para tonterias o que haya sido marginado es otra cosa pero loco estamos en el 2005 y todavia linux es dificil de usar y no tiene estandar
nadie quiere nada dificil eso es cosa del pasado las cosas cambian y el que no se ajuste se queda atras y asi siempre sera.
quien quiere bajar una aplicacion y conbvertirla a otro formato e instalar por command prompt ,o si es un flavor no coje rpm y si es otro flavor no coje los .deb de debia o los packetes tar.gz de slackware, o si es vidalinux que viene esnu sin casi nada o si es red hat que es bastante bueno y suse los demas estan bastante a tras de la vision de ellos que es easy use=a.k.a window wannabe
aunque windows aya empezado como una porqueria easy to use les a resultado hasta ahora.ademas el de lo que se hablabla es la seguridad que te ofrece un producto en este caso en un gobierno comunista donde lo pierdes todo pues linux no da esa seguridad pero como te fuiste por la tanjente pues yo lo hice tambien ,microsoft tiene mas probabilidad de hacercarse a lo que linux hace ke lo ke tiene de probabilidad linux de adaptarse a lo que tiene microsft seamos realistas.linux lo que es dos o tres años mas joven que microsoft y microsoft esta arreglando muchas de las porquerias que tiraban ya hoy en dia no es asi.no tengo mas que decir el tiempo dira .. pero francamente pienso que siempre se quedara igual el tren se le fue a linux en algunas cosas pero en algunas cosas no hay quien le gane pero en negocios lo que importa a algunos no les importa a otros asi que lo que le importa a la mayoria sigue dominando microsoft y linux no ,sinceramente espero que linux mejore en muchos respectos pero mientras no se presente un standar creo que no podra hacer ese gran caso .
Quien rayos vende software con polizas de seguro por si te demandan ???
LINUX ONLY THAT SUCKS MAN
Un Poco de Historia
Si leyeras sabrias que Linux y Microsoft no tienen el mismo tiempo; Microsoft comenzó en 1975 pero no fué hasta 1981 que se incorporó y se dio a conocer cuando se asoció con IBM para suplirle el Sistema Operatico MS-DOS, el cual era una versión "Fisher-Price" de Unix. Que dicho sea de paso, no lo creó Microsoft; sino que fue comprado a otra persona y Microsoft le hizo modificaciones.
El MS-DOS era un Sistema Operativo que funcionaba a base de comandos en línea y fue muy famoso en los años ochenta y principios de los 90. Para esta época, Apple ya contaba con un Sistema Operativo con una interfase gráfica. A finales de los ochenta sacaron Windows el cual apenas se conocia hasta el 1990 con la versión 3. Windows era mas bien una "utilidad" que corria sobre DOS. No fue hasta el 1995 que la gente se fijo en Microsoft, cuando sacaron Windows 95. Yo creo que también los conoces a partir de ahi. O sea, Microsoft se puso sólido en el mercado 20 años despues.
Linux fue creado como parte de un proyecto de una clase universitaria y dado a conocer en 1991. También es basado en Unix (Minix, para ser exacto, un "sabor" de Unix). Al igual que DOS era basado en Comandos de Línea y luego elaboraron interfases gráficas como KDE y Gnome.
Bill Gates dijo hace varios años que Linux no era una amenaza; ya que éste era un Sistema Operativo para "hobby" y estudiantes universitarios. Pero sin embargo en el pasado año hemos visto un creciente número de anuncios anti-linux en las revistas. Si te das a la tarea de bajar el Informe Financiero de Microsoft (2004), mencionan a Linux como una amenaza competitiva; no lo digo yo, lo dice el informe.
Es cierto que a Linux le falta madurar un poco; pero el año 2004 fué para Linux (13 años) lo que fue el 1995 para Windows.
Pero no te vayas lejos, ¿quien ha dicho que a Windows no le hace falta madurar? si Windows es la razón de ser de los virus y spyware. Cuando Windows llegue a su total desarrollo y sea 100% estable, seguro y robusto; las compañías anti-virus quebrarán. Y te repito, no lo digo yo... lee!!!.
Un poco de historia presente
Deja de vivir en el pasado en el presente M$ domina y no Linux esa es la verdadera historia que esta pasando ahora mismo y tu sigues viviendo en el pasado.
bueno..
si quieres hablar de historia, vamos a hablar de por que Bill Gates desde el 2000 esta vendiendo grandes cantidades de sus acciones de MS? por que Steve Ballmer en el 2001 vendio grandes cantidades tambien? y si ves aqui:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=MSFT
veras que Bill Gates sigue vendiendo sus acciones como loco. Conste que esto Bill Gates comenzo a hacerlo desde el 2000 en adelante, no antes.
no quiero decir que MS este en quiebra, pero esto da a entender que ya MS no puede crecer mas en los stocks, y si ves:
http://www.google.com/search?oi=stock&q=stocks:MSFT
ves que es cierto, ya MS no es la gran compañia de antes.. ya todo el mundo sabe que es una computadora y no se les esta haciendo facil engañarnos. Tambien esta el issue de que a quien mas le venderan windows? sale longhorn y no venderan tantos como han vendido anteriormente.. asi que a buscar subscripciones para cobrar mensualidades.
creo que el que tiene que tienes razon en cuanto a que vives en el presente, pero nosotros vivimos en el futuro.. aqui te esperamos! :-p
n el futuro por eso es que siempre estan soñando
Pues si vives en el futuro aprende de acciones cuando una compañia es muy grande dividen las acciones o quieres que te explique tambien como funciona el 401k.
Y si se que vives en el futuro por eso es que siempre estan soñando.
y de los servicios de microsoft que se caen son los print services en win 2000 pero en 2003 no da problema ademas esto es cuestion de tener todo al dia. kernel updates ups sorry quise decir service packs , lol
jajajaja
win 2003? por q crees q la gente usa win2k todavia? win2003 esta inestable. Tener todo al dia en windows solo lo q hace es mantener los bugs al dia, asi que cuando encuentren los nuevos bugs ya se opacaron por los nuevos. Bueno que menciones kernel updates... ya que windows usa un kernel pero a diferencia de linux windows no da upgrades al kernel, solo updates para fixes.. si acaso.. sin embargo el kernel de linux es upgrades+updates y si buscas los tipos de fixes.. por lo general no son fixes criticos como en windows ya que no hay tantos tipos de errores de ese tipo... busca cuando fue el ultimo remote exploit en linux y busca lo mismo en windows.. veras a q me refiero.
no solo eso
ahora mismo linux es mas "maduro" que windows.
la diferencia es que los drivers de windows los hacen las compañias... en linux los hacen los mismos hackers del kernel, esto no tiene que ser asi.. un ejemplo son los drivers de nvidia los cuales se podrian coger de ejemplo de como podria funcionar linux si las compañias creadoras de hardware le dieran importancia a linux. Jugar juegos 3D en linux me corren mas estable que en windows usando los drivers de nvidia.
otra cosa es de la gran inmensidad de software para windows, si comparas el software que trae de por si windows y comparas con linux... es obvio que linux es mas maduro, eso sin contar con que linux es capas de hacer clusters, terminal servers, y tiene una inmensa variedad de servers.
una pregunta
Que juegos ??????????
que importa el software que trae linux ,en e market empresarial el software viene para windows ,hello ya windows puede hacer clusters con server 2003 ,hablas de windows pero no sabes de windows.terminal servers eso lo hace desde nt4!!!! y a que te refieres a inmensa variedad de servers claro que tienen inmensa variedad por que en windows no se necesitan tantos servers para hacer par de cosas por que es mas integrado!!!!! no ves la noticia de arriba de red hat directory servers es caminando a windows wannabe de active directory. hoy en dia es la mejor manera de manejar redes enormes active directory antes era NDS de novell.
y tambien tenemos inmensa variedad de servers informate antes de hablar niño
...y tambien...
con eso lo dices todo..osea trabajas para MS?... la pregunta es, por que estas aqui si todo lo que dices es tan real? la respuesta.. por que te duele saber que lo que dijiste es pura fantasia, tienen de todo pero chapusiao... si es tan real, por que la mayoria de las compañias grandes usan cualquier otra cosa que no sea windows? si comparas la estabilidad y calidad de programas entre windows y linux, linux es mas maduro en cuanto a seguridad, redes y errores en el sistema. Por que crees que MS ha tirado poco a poco los features de sus OS server NT, win2k al desktop? respuesta: por que la gente va aprendiendo y pidiendo mas control y calidad osea que no es extraño que el uso de linux en desktop este aumentando y siga aumentando, eventualmente tu estaras aqui en linux y negaras que alguna vez usaste windows, me topo con gente como tu a diario, si no es asi.. por que estas aqui entonces?
por que uso los dos
por que uso los dos por eso estoy aqui y cuando idolatran a linux por gente como tu FANATICO no neutral pues respondo la verdad.
...
ok, "usas" linux... el problema es que no sabes usar linux, simple y sencillo, asi que la verdad tuya esta limitada a tus conocimientos, los cuales son obviamente limitados... asi que eventualmente no respondes la verdad solo respondes defendiendo tu frustracion por tus conocimientos limitados y falta de motivacion por aprender cosas nuevas. Lo de la chilla no fui yo, no veo logico que una persona que "ame" sea infiel, asi que no estoy deacuerdo a la analogia... no confundo cariño con amor. Mi definicion de Amor es lo que uno siente por padres y hermanos, algo dificil de encontrar en parejas, pero posible.
blabla
blablabla
en resumidas palabras
Windows es mi esposa y linux es mi chilla y no dejaria por nada a mi esposa pero en lo que no me complazca ahi esta mi chilla pero amo mas a mi esposa.
jajajaja... jodes mucho con t
jajajaja... jodes mucho con tus comentarios extremistas y necios, pero esa analogía que hiciste te quedo buena!!!
lol
chacho en Windows necesitas un server para cada servicio lol dejate de eso en la empresa que yo trabajo tienen un windows server 2003 con exchange y eso siempre esta en el piso jajajaja y en otro departamento corren uno Linux y usan sendmail y nunca nunca se cae! aparte de que corren un pal de servicios mas en ese mismo servidor y mano esta pasao el windows si le metes algun otro servicio jajaja lo sientas a pedir cacao! y por si aca ese server windows es un dual Xeon con 2GB de ram!!! jajajajaja
Bueno
Bueno si el departamento tecnico de tu empresa es inepto pues nada mas con el caso .Exchange siempre les dara problemas
GNU/Linux Rules!
Dices: "Sigue siendo un pais comunista en venezuela hay un descojon y naide es dueño de lo que era por decir todos sus ahorros si tu apoyas a venezuela como pais comunisatas es tu problema si los del pdswhathever no queria que el gobierno acesaran a sus computadoras por algo seria". En primer lugar, PDVSA ES DEL GOBIERNO, es decir, el gobierno tiene pleno derecho de accesar sus propios servidores. Los que crearon ese problema fue un pequeño grupo de saboteadores que quisieron inmovilizar PDVSA para crear la impresión de un paro que realmente la inmensa mayor parte de los empleados de PDVSA se oponían. En segundo lugar, en Venezuela todo el mundo es dueño de sus ahorros. Si tú vas a un banco privado, puedes tener tu propia cuenta de ahorros tal como en los países capitalistas. Por lo tanto, es falso decir que la gente no tiene sus propios ahorros.
En cuanto a Microsoft, no es especulación mía que Microsoft está utilizando software libre. No hace mucho, Microsoft había migrado muchos de sus servidores a GNU/Linux y admite que tiene que aprender mucho del movimiento de software libre. ¿No me crees? Aquí y aquí hay información al respecto, aquí hay una noticia sobre Microsoft reclutando a expertos en GNU/Linux, y aquí nos habla sobre cómo MSN Hotmail no pudo utilizar Windows 2000, y tuvo que migrar sus servidores a FreeBSD. Así que ésas no son especulaciones de mi parte, es una realidad.
En cuanto a Wine, hay usuarios de GNU/Linux que lo utilizan por razones bien particulares. En mi caso dejé de usarlo hace tiempo. Las mejoras de los programas de GNU/Linux han sido tan significativas, que ya ni me hace falta correr software propietario con Wine. El 99% de los programas que corren en mi máquina son libres, en cuanto al 1% restante es programa propietario que no es de Microsoft (Java y Flash), y que eventualmente me desharé tan pronto existan los sustitutos libres adecuados. Así que puedo decir con mucho orgullo que no necesito a Microsoft para nada. Y sé que muchos allá afuera que utilizan GNU/Linux cada vez más están en las mismas que yo en ese aspecto.
En cuanto al dominio del mercado, eso no necesariamente es un indicador de que los productos de Microsoft son mejores. Al contrario, precisamente porque es monopolio, los productos de Microsoft han perdido mucha calidad, a pesar de que trata de impresionar al usuario con características que parecen nítidas a primera vista. Sin embargo, en muchos casos utilizar el formato de Microsoft puede resultar dañino e incluso en ocasiones peligroso (por metadatos y virus). También las mejoras a los programas dependen demasiado de Microsoft. En el caso de GNU/Linux nunca me he tenido que preocupar por nada de eso, ni tengo que depender de absolutamente nada, y tengo un sistema plenamente estable.
También el alegato de que GNU/Linux no tiene estándar es falso. GNU/Linux ha establecido un estándar en el mundo de Unix, y en el caso de Microsoft, en muchos casos ha tenido que adoptar sus programas para los estándares del mundo de Unix, tales como permitir el uso de Apache, PHP, MySQL, entre muchos otros estándares. Quisiera añadir que el mismo Microsoft está bien atento a las determinaciones de OASIS, un consorcio de compañías para establecer estándares entre programas. OASIS recientemente declaró como estándar OpenDocument creado por la gente de OpenOffice.org. El mismo Microsoft es un impulsor de OASIS.
En cuanto a las distribuciones de GNU/Linux, si los paquetes de Debian funcionan o no en Red Hat, o si los paquetes RPMS no funcionan en Debian es irrelevante. En primer lugar, el acceso al código fuente permite la creación de dichos paquetes dependientes de distribuciones. En segundo lugar, aún en esos casos se han creado programas que permiten instalar RPMS en distribuciones que no usan RPMS. Por ejemplo, Gentoo Linux puede instalar RPMS gracias a programas que permiten hacerlo, y hay programas que pueden transformar RPMS a paquetes de Debian, para poderse usar en Debian. En tercer lugar TODOS las distribuciones de GNU/Linux pueden utilizar paquetes .tar.gz, y no son exclusivos de Slackware (lo que lleva a la conclusión de que no tienes la menor idea de lo que hablas). En cuanto a Vidalinux Desktop, no sé qué quieres decir con que "viene esnú", ya que cuenta con Portage y Porthole con los que se pueden instalar programas bien fácilmente.
En cuanto a GNU/Linux "adaptarse a Microsoft" me deja sin cuidado. Son las malas costumbres que Microsoft ha inducido a la gente que lo hace super propensos a virus, programas maliciosos, trojans, entre otros. Aunque GNU/Linux sea más difícil, es una dificultad que tiene una razón de ser. Y por cierto, es una dificultad que va disminuyendo cada vez más, ya que los desktops como GNOME y KDE están haciendo sus propios programas lo más "user-friendly" posible. Hoy no hay los problemas tan arduos de configuración que había antes, y la cosa sigue mejorando.
Finalmente, por favor, aprende a escribir. Existen los puntos, las comas, los punto y comas, los dos puntos, paréntesis, signos de interrogación, signos de admiración y cosas así que pueden ayudarte a expresar más claramente tus ideas.
Reality migrations not imagination Linux migrated to M$
Two years after deploying Linux to several thousand point-of-service devices, Regal Entertainment Group found that it lacked the vendor support and remote management tools necessary to support the company's strategic plans. Upon examining the cost to acquire those items separately, Regal selected Microsoft Windows XP Embedded because it offered a lower total cost of ownership. In addition, Windows XP Embedded will allow Regal to support point-of-service terminals remotely using its existing IT skill set, improve security, and reduce the risk of intellectual property infringement claims. The move to Windows XP Embedded follows the company's recent migration of its corporate IT infrastructure to Microsoft Windows Server System from Novell. When deployment is complete, Regal will have an integrated Windows-based infrastructure that extends from the data center to the point of service.
Situation
Regal Entertainment Group is one of the largest motion picture exhibitors in the world, with a 41-state presence that includes 6,251 screens in 560 locations in the United States. The company has 25,000 employees, serves 46 of the top 50 U.S. markets, sells 270 million tickets per year, and generates U.S.$2.5 billion in annual revenues—more than 20 percent of all domestic box office receipts.
Regal traditionally has relied on two separate point-of-service systems to support theater operations. Its box office system, which was deployed several years ago, runs on desktop PCs that connect to a server computer in the theater's office. Food and beverage sales, supported by a different system, were migrated from electronic cash registers to computerized point-of-service terminals in 2002. Regal deployed Red Hat Linux as the operating system for its point-of-service systems and developed its own Java-based point-of-service application. To minimize costs, Regal did not purchase support for the free Linux kernel, instead choosing to maintain it internally.
Two years later, in 2004, Regal embarked on a major overhaul of its theater systems, including the development of a common point-of-service application that could support both box office and food and beverage sales, as well as new customer self-service kiosks. Currently in development, the solution will integrate all three of those systems, streamline reporting, and improve the ability of the company to centrally manage theater operations from headquarters. It also will include support for gift cards and a customer loyalty program. Through those new capabilities, the solution is projected to deliver U.S.$10 million in cost savings over the next five years.
As part of the project, Regal decided to evaluate whether Linux was the best operating system for its new point-of-service solution. Along with its increasing reliance on technology to drive revenue growth and improve operational efficiency, Regal had to ensure that its point-of-service platform could deliver everything required to build an integrated retail enterprise. Linux, as currently deployed, was missing a few things that the company knew it would need.
For example, without additional software and services, Linux did not provide any way to remotely update the Linux kernel after a point-of-service device was deployed, leaving the company with thousands of deployed point-of-service devices running two-year-old versions of the operating system, complete with all security issues. In addition, without acquiring additional tools, the company's centralized IT staff would have no way to remotely access and troubleshoot the devices, forcing theaters to ship them to headquarters and wait for replacements to arrive when a problem arose. In the meantime, profitable food and beverage operations would run at less than full capacity.
Regal had come to realize that all the extras it would need—in fact, everything but the Linux kernel itself—came at a cost. "When we chose to use Linux for our home-built point-of service application, a relatively small project, our decision was based on the perception that it was free," says J. E. Henry, Chief Information Officer at Regal. "However, with our new plans to drive revenues and profitability through the use of technology, there comes the need to minimize any associated risks. If issues are preventing us from reaching our business goals, we need to know that the tools and assistance needed to resolve the problem will be there. For us, that requires a remotely manageable, vendor-supported platform."
In addition, Regal determined that its long-term strategy would require greater flexibility and manageability from its corporate IT infrastructure, which ran Novell NetWare and GroupWise. For example, when Regal attempted to implement a mobile e-mail solution, the third-party software that the company had chosen required the installation of Microsoft® Exchange Server and a gateway server to connect with GroupWise. In addition, many of the applications being deployed by the company required Microsoft Windows®–based authentication, which required Regal to implement both Novell eDirectory and the Active Directory® service in the Windows Server™ operating system.
Given our situation, Windows XP Embedded was significantly more cost-effective than Linux, coming in at a double-digit savings in TCO.
J. E. Henry
Chief Information Officer, Regal Entertainment Group
Solution
After in-depth evaluation of an approach based on Red Hat Linux and one based on Microsoft software, Regal Entertainment Group decided to migrate its more than 7,000 point-of-service terminals to the Microsoft Windows XP Embedded operating system. The new solution based on Windows XP Embedded will enable Regal to innovate beyond its current Linux solution to deliver a common point-of-service environment that includes box office point-of-service terminals, as well as those that support food and beverage sales.
In choosing between Red Hat Linux and Windows XP Embedded, Regal closely examined the total device life cycle costs for both options, including software licensing fees, vendor support, update management, and the tools required for maintenance and support. Although the Linux kernel was free, the cost of everything else that Regal would need to support the open source approach quickly outweighed any savings on software licensing fees.
"When we calculated the total cost of ownership for Red Hat Linux using a 10-year Net Present Value model, we were very surprised at how expensive it was," says Henry. "Given our situation, Windows XP Embedded was significantly more cost-effective than Linux, coming in at a double-digit savings in TCO. We put a good deal of effort into ensuring that it was a fair comparison, examining multiple device update technologies and support vendors for Linux. But the maintenance-related expenses for Linux were far greater than those for Windows."
Regal also saw the long-term road map for Windows XP Embedded as an advantage over Linux. The company's point-of-service devices have a projected 10-year life, so the platform on which they run must remain viable for that same period. The commitments that Microsoft has made to the embedded market, including one of the industry's largest research and development budgets and an extended support life cycle, gave Regal a level of comfort that Linux could not provide.
With Windows, we get an integrated, easily managed platform that can extend from the data center to our point-of-service devices—all supported by one vendor.
Cliff DeYoung
Chief Technology Officer, Regal Entertainment Group
"We needed a platform that would be supported and enhanced for the next 10 years, and didn't see a long-term road map for embedded Linux," says Cliff DeYoung, Chief Technology Officer at Regal. "In contrast, Microsoft has made a long-term commitment to the embedded market and is investing heavily in that space."
Features for Point-of-Service Systems
After selecting Windows XP Embedded, Regal worked with Microsoft to implement a short proof of concept. The results verified that Windows could meet all technical requirements: remote installation of software updates, remote management and support, a minimal operating system installation, support for the company's existing point-of-service hardware, and the ability to run the point-of-service application that Regal will use. Some of the features of Windows XP Embedded that Regal plans to use include:
Remote management and support. Terminal Services, a feature of Windows XP Embedded, will allow the company's centralized IT team to remotely access and troubleshoot point-of-service devices.
Remote updates. Device Update Agent, a Windows-based service that runs on the embedded device, provides a way for Regal to quickly and easily keep point-of-service systems updated without having to physically touch each device.
Component-based architecture. Because Windows XP Embedded is component based, Regal can build an operating system image that includes only the functionality required for its specific solution.
Driver availability. Windows XP Embedded is based on the same binaries as Windows XP Professional, which will help ensure the availability and compatibility of device drivers for new point-of-service system peripherals that Regal may want to use.
Rollout of Windows XP Embedded is scheduled to be completed in time for the 2005 summer movie season. In parallel, Regal will upgrade the single server in each theater from Microsoft Windows NT® Server operating system version 4.0 to the Microsoft Windows Server 2003 operating system, the foundation of Microsoft Windows Server System™ integrated server software.
Integration with Corporate IT Infrastructure
The move to Windows XP Embedded and Windows Server 2003 in the company's 560 theaters follows the recent migration of its corporate IT infrastructure to Windows Server System, in which Regal replaced NetWare and GroupWise with Windows Server 2003 and Exchange Server 2003. "NetWare and GroupWise could not meet our needs in the long term, whereas Windows Server System can," says Henry. "We're now able to take advantage of the broad range of Microsoft and third-party solutions for Windows Server System, such as the one we're now implementing for connectivity between Exchange Server and our mobile devices."
When we calculated the total cost of ownership for Red Hat Linux using a 10-year Net Present Value model, we were very surprised at how expensive it was.
J. E. Henry
Chief Information Officer, Regal Entertainment Group
When deployment of Windows XP Embedded to theaters is completed, the company's use of the Windows platform will extend from the data center to the point-of-service devices that are used to service its 270 million annual customers. The new infrastructure will help reduce system administration costs and, through that improved manageability, help the company keep its systems updated to minimize potential security risks—in turn leaving the Regal IT team with more time to deliver new value for its internal and external customers.
"The bottom line is that, for our IT organization to be successful, we need to provide exceptional customer service," says Henry. "And for us, a customer is anyone who touches a computer at any time, including the employees who use point-of-service terminals and moviegoers who use one of our new kiosks or purchase tickets online. We must focus on the delivery of effective business solutions instead of IT infrastructure. Given our desire for a secure, integrated, and easily managed infrastructure on which to deliver those solutions, the best way to achieve that goal is to bring our point-of-service environment onto the same platform as our corporate IT systems."
Henry cites the company's recent experience with the Microsoft organization as another reason that Regal is increasing its use of Windows. "Microsoft has become a good deal more in tune with its customers over the last few years," he says. "Within my organization, people who used to have negative perceptions about Microsoft and Windows have since done an about-face and are now some of the company's strongest advocates. We're doing a lot more with Windows, and Microsoft is helping us deliver good results. Our migration from Novell software to Windows Server System went very well, in part due to the assistance that we received from our local Microsoft account team. With Microsoft, we know who to call when issues arise—and that they'll take ownership of any problems and marshal whatever resources are required to help us keep the business running smoothly."
Benefits
By selecting Microsoft Windows XP Embedded over Red Hat Linux for its point-of service systems, Regal Entertainment Group is meeting its need for a remotely managed, vendor-supported point-of-service solution at the lowest total cost of ownership. Moreover, the company's decision to use Windows will help Regal make better use of limited IT resources, improve security, and reduce legal risk.
With Linux, we would have needed to commit additional resources to make it work.
Cliff DeYoung
Chief Technology Officer, Regal Entertainment Group
"We're not the right kind of company for Linux to work well," says DeYoung. "We run a lean IT shop for a $2.5 billion company, with 50 people supporting our corporate headquarters and 560 remote locations. We're big enough that we need a connected, easily managed environment, yet are too small to build the entire required infrastructure by hand. With Linux, we would have had to commit additional resources to make it work. With Windows, we get an integrated, easily managed platform that can extend from the data center to our point-of-service devices—all supported by one vendor."
Adds Henry, "Our selection of Windows XP Embedded over Red Hat Linux was more than just a tactical decision on which operating system to run on our point-of-service devices. It was part of a strategic decision to have an enterprise architecture that provides maximum flexibility and manageability at a lowest total cost of ownership. We want our corporate and point-of-service solutions to converge, and Windows XP Embedded will help us realize that goal. I'm not saying that we won't consider Linux again at some point in the future. Microsoft offered the best option for us today and will need to continue to do so if it wants to keep our business."
Significantly Lower Total Cost of Ownership
Based on the research done by Regal, Windows XP Embedded is projected to cost considerably less than Red Hat Linux over the 10-year life of its point-of-service systems, even with a Windows XP Embedded operating system upgrade factored in during the seventh year. The company's analysis focused on initial licensing cost outlays and ongoing license maintenance costs. The analysis also considered the company's existing investment in Microsoft software and existing software skills already on staff.
IT resources are scarce in Knoxville, Tennessee, and there are a lot more resources available for the Windows platform than there are for Linux.
Cliff DeYoung
Chief Technology Officer, Regal Entertainment Group
"We required the ability to distribute software and to manage our environment remotely," says Henry. "The Red Hat support model required that we renew our agreement each year—a very different approach than the Microsoft licensing model. Over time, the costs to run Linux became progressively more expensive than the cost to run Microsoft software. The results of our analysis clearly identified significant advantages in the selection of Microsoft software, making Windows our platform of choice. Our initial analysis was so conclusive that no further study was needed."
Improved Manageability
With both point-of-service and corporate IT systems running Windows, Regal can manage and support its entire IT infrastructure with a single tool set and skill set, both of which the company already has in-house. The remote support and management features provided by Windows XP Embedded will allow the company to easily extend the reach of its centralized IT team to support theater point-of-service systems. Windows Server 2003 will enable the Regal IT team to use the same techniques and tools to remotely access and support servers, including the 560 systems in its theaters and numerous systems in its data center.
"Consolidation onto a single platform will make our centralized support model more efficient, as will the remote support and management tools in Windows XP Embedded," says DeYoung. "In addition, it will be far easier to augment our existing IT organization with outside resources when additional help is needed. Skilled IT resources are scarce in Knoxville, Tennessee, and there are a lot more resources available for the Windows platform than there are for Linux."
In the past, with the servers in theaters running Windows NT Server and those in the Regal data center running NetWare, the company had to maintain two IT skill sets and system management processes for its server systems alone. The Linux-based point-of-service systems required a third set of processes, tools, and skills. Moving forward, the company can manage all its systems with a single set of tools, skills, and processes, providing a level of consistency and economy of scale that will help Regal to maximize the stability and security of its connected infrastructure and help control IT costs as the company's use of technology continues to grow.
"Moving forward, we'll be able to look to a single vendor for software updates and support, which will reduce the work required to proactively manage our systems and improve response times if issues do arise," says Henry. "Furthermore, the time spent on vendor management will decrease because we'll no longer need to maintain as many support relationships or licensing agreements. All those changes will help reduce the time and effort it takes to support our IT infrastructure, leaving more resources to deliver new solutions and service our customers. Even with the new capabilities we'll have, I expect consolidation on the Windows platform to reduce the time spent on day-to-day system administration."
Reduced risk was a decision factor in selecting Windows over Linux. … With the way that Microsoft stands behind its products, it's one less thing that I have to worry about.
J. E. Henry
Chief Information Officer, Regal Entertainment Group
Increased Security
Through its component-based architecture, Windows XP Embedded will help Regal reduce security risks. The company can include only the operating system functionality that it deems necessary, thus minimizing the potential attack surface for viruses, worms, and other software-based threats. "The component-based nature of Windows XP Embedded was a key factor in our decision to switch from Linux," says DeYoung. "With Linux, we had to install the entire package. With Windows XP Embedded and the advanced tools that Microsoft provides for sizing and building a system image, we can significantly reduce the operating system footprint and decrease the number of potential security issues for our point-of-service systems."
In addition, after an initial system image is created and deployed, the remote management and update features of Windows XP Embedded will help Regal increase the security of its systems by facilitating the installation of new security updates. To further reduce the cost of maintaining a secure environment, Regal is evaluating the use of Microsoft Systems Management Server as a way to push software updates to the theater level from a centralized location.
The company's move to Windows Server 2003 will help improve security for its corporate IT infrastructure, as well as for the servers in its theaters. The granular role-based security model provided by the Active Directory service in Windows Server 2003 will allow Regal to provide each user with only those administrative privileges required to do their jobs—and to assign those permissions to people based on their job roles.
"Windows Server System delivers a wealth of security-related enhancements and innovations that will help us improve security," says DeYoung. "In addition, the tools provided for managing those security features will help us keep our systems more secure over time."
Reduced Legal Risk
The selection of Windows over Linux will help Regal reduce its exposure to financial risk. Unlike many Linux vendors, Microsoft provides customers with strong indemnification against patent, copyright, trade secret, and trademark infringement claims without a monetary limit. Furthermore, the company is committed to ensuring that licensing issues and questions of intellectual property do not present problems for its customers—and makes it a priority to manage third-party intellectual property in its products so that customers can stay focused on running their businesses.
"Reduced risk was a decision factor in selecting Windows over Linux," says Henry. "We needed to minimize our exposure to the distraction of potential intellectual property infringement claims. With the way that Microsoft stands behind its products, it's one less thing that I have to worry about."
Smarter Retailing
The Regal deployment of Windows XP Embedded is a solid example of the Microsoft Smarter Retailing Initiative at work. The initiative was launched in part to help the retail industry respond to consumer demands for convenience and information on their own terms and across multiple channels, business demands for streamlined operations, and store demands for associate efficiency and customer service capabilities. Designed to optimize business processes, Smarter Retailing helps retailers reduce costs, run more efficiently, gain greater business visibility, and make better and faster business decisions.
Lower TCO Deploying Supercomputers on Windows Instead of Linux
Equifax, a global leader in transforming data into intelligence, has migrated many of its key operations from mainframes to Microsoft Windows–based Intel processor clusters to enhance the speed and performance of its marketing services capabilities. Selecting Windows over Linux, Equifax has deployed massively parallel supercomputer clusters to streamline operations, reduce costs, and improve customer service. Financial models that once took days to run on the mainframe can now be done in hours, providing customers with faster time to value. Using Windows-based supercomputer clusters, Equifax is now able to seamlessly aggregate and analyze data from disparate sources and help customers compile and manage numerous types of credit, financial, public record, demographic, and marketing information in real time. Using Microsoft Windows Server System, the company has seen 14 percent in cost savings over Linux.
Situation
Founded in 1899 and headquartered in Atlanta, Equifax is a U.S.$1.2 billion enterprise and member of the Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 Index. As one of the leading credit reporting entities, Equifax serves its customers by utilizing information and technology that provide real-time answers to increasingly complex questions.
Publicly owned since 1965 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange since 1971, Equifax enables and secures global commerce with consumers and businesses across a wide range of industries, including financial services, retail, telecommunications, utilities, mortgage, brokerage, insurance, automotive, healthcare, and transportation. Its products and services include consumer credit management, information database management, marketing services, business credit data, decisioning and analytic tools, and identity verification tools. With a committed workforce of more than 4,600 employees and businesses that span three continents, Equifax continues to grow and innovate, achieving consistent marketshare gains and attracting marquee clients, large and small.
To help its customers sustain competitive advantage, Equifax has incorporated direct marketing and credit marketing capabilities to its value-added services, which include segmentation and analysis on credit and demographic information. One of its major business units, Equifax Direct Marketing Services provides clients with prospective customer lists drawn from various demographic and credit analyses. Another major business, Equifax Credit Marketing Services includes credit marketing products and offerings such as pre-screenings and account review services to help Equifax clients acquire new customers and capture new business opportunities from existing relationships.
With the country's largest database of online and offline direct marketing information, Equifax is equipped to identify and deliver information to address specific customer needs. For example, a life insurance company could come to Equifax to help them develop a list of target households that are interested in certain types of offerings. To create the list, Equifax would analyze attributes such as age, income, and lifestyle by drawing the information from periodical subscription data housed in its Direct Marketing Services database.
While Equifax professionals have extensive experience with Linux-based solutions, we recognized that the performance and reliability of the Windows operating system, combined with the integrated suite of Microsoft development tools, would provide a significantly lower TCO as we build into the future.
Joe Chappell
Senior Vice President, Technology, Equifax
For Equifax Direct Marketing Services, the need to enable faster search results and better solutions was paramount. This business worked with five disparate legacy systems that Equifax had acquired over the years from separate companies. The inherited code was more than 25 years old and had been written in Assembly language, resulting in slower and more time-consuming programming than today's C, C++ and C#. Collecting data was tedious with five core databases hosted on four different mainframes. Each legacy system required a different interface, further complicating the data search and retrieval process. Using these various systems and databases to process information represented a very complex supply chain and it could often take significant time to fulfill customer orders.
Equifax is committed to providing the market with differentiated offerings to facilitate new and faster marketing programs. Updating its technical capabilities to provide more flexible solutions and decreasing program cycle times topped the list of marketing service priorities.
Solution
Equifax implemented a massively parallel cluster architecture composed of hundreds of Microsoft® Windows®–based Intel-processor servers running a custom parallel database application.
Equifax Direct Marketing Services became the company's first supercomputer cluster installation after linking Intel-based computers running the Microsoft Windows 2000 Server operating system. Enabling coordinated searches across all the cluster nodes, the solution is designed to provide integrated results. Plans are underway to upgrade nodes to computers with processor speeds of 3 gigahertz.
Choosing the Best Solution
When planning for a new solution, Equifax had to address two primary needs: a database that could flexibly support massive data transfer rates and an operating system that could facilitate data access and support rapid and complex development cycles. For the database component, Equifax looked at various technologies, including all major relational database management systems as well as several unique access methods. Equifax chose to focus on commodity computing based on Intel architecture, leaving it two primary choices in the operating systems world—Linux-based or Windows-based solutions. Given Equifax's unique system requirements, Windows proved to be the strategic choice.
"While Equifax professionals have extensive experience with Linux-based solutions, we recognized that the performance and reliability of the Windows operating system, combined with the integrated suite of Microsoft development tools, would provide a significantly lower TCO as we build into the future," says Joe Chappell, Senior Vice President, Technology, Equifax.
For Equifax Direct Marketing Services, the five separate legacy systems were retired and the once disparate data was loaded on to the Windows-based supercomputer cluster. To sustain the business unit's ongoing development needs, Equifax employed tools such as the Microsoft Visual Studio® development system version 6.0.
Keeping All Data in Memory
Armed with Equifax-designed application layers and strategies, each parallel supercomputer cluster provides a 200-fold increase in computing power and data transfer capability. With its new solution in place, Equifax is able to house its data store as a flat file across hundreds of nodes of its cluster, keeping all data in memory for fast searching.
"Our Windows-based supercomputers have already exceeded our performance and reliability expectations," said Matt Magnotte, Senior Vice President, Direct Marketing Services, Equifax. "Queries can now be completed in a matter of hours using the Windows-based clusters."
Equifax also developed its own patent-pending credit criteria generating technology, running on a second-generation supercomputer cluster, with its PCs running the Microsoft Windows XP Professional operating system. For customers that require complex financial modeling, the speed and flexibility of the supercomputer cluster enables Equifax to significantly reduce turnaround time for its customer base.
By migrating to a Windows-based supercomputer cluster, we have netted millions of dollars due to reduced mainframe costs.
Matt Magnotte
Senior Vice President, Direct Marketing Services, Equifax
Both groups anticipate upgrading their clusters to the Standard Edition of the Microsoft Windows Server™ 2003 operating system, the foundation of Microsoft Windows Server System™ integrated server software.
Benefits
With the power of supercomputing at its fingertips, Equifax and its customers are reaping the benefits. Migrating its operations to two Windows-based supercomputer clusters, Equifax has implemented an infrastructure to take advantage of changing business conditions and address the complex needs of its customers. Leveraging the scalability of these supercomputer clusters, Equifax has achieved a number of benchmarks, including reduced processing times, compressed development cycles for internal projects, and decreased mainframe use required to manage legacy systems. With a 14 percent lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), Equifax's investment in Windows Server System has touched several key aspects of Equifax's business.
Unifying Disparate Systems
By unifying its disparate data stores, the Windows-based supercomputer clusters enabled faster searches, allowing Equifax to deliver more value-added services. Since Equifax's previous systems had five different sets of code, its salespeople had to be trained on five different systems in order to fulfill customer requests. In addition, administrators who needed to add product updates had to make these changes five different times—once for each system. The supercomputer clusters provided an easy solution to these headaches.
Able to work across all databases, the supercomputer clusters allowed Equifax to write Prospect Select, an internal application designed to integrate data from Direct Marketing Services and Credit Marketing Services.
"Developing Prospect Select allows our customers to go beyond simply compiling credit attributes," says Magnotte. "The Windows-based supercomputers make it easy to import additional databases, enabling searches to include demographic and lifestyle data."
Faster Than Mainframes
No one knows the time value of data better than Equifax. Using Windows-based supercomputer clusters, Equifax slashed the time required to process customer requests and deliver critical data more quickly. Housing its data store as a flat file across the cluster's hundreds of nodes, these supercomputer clusters give Equifax the flexibility to partition data and perform parallel computing, resulting in faster searches and more sophisticated customer analytics. The company has found that complex financial models that once took days to run on the mainframe can now be done in hours, and models that once took hours can now be done in a matter of minutes.
"We work with countless financial institutions and credit card companies that request complex decisioning models to assess potential customer bases and target clients," says Chappell. "With these supercomputers, we can bring together information across the value chain in minutes, enabling companies to leverage our business intelligence to attract profitable customers more quickly."
14 Percent Cost Savings over Linux
To address its ongoing development needs, Equifax relied on Microsoft development tools. Using Visual Studio and the Microsoft Visual C++® development system, Equifax was able to quickly create applications designed to provide its customers with new marketing programs such as customer modeling and analytics. With Visual Studio development tools, Equifax developers gained access to a programming language that offered reduced complexity and a scalable foundation for future business requirements.
"Microsoft Visual Studio helped us expedite the code writing process, allowing us to significantly reduce development times," says Fred Hughes, Senior Vice President, Software Development at Equifax. "This improvement in development time has allowed us to address the evolving needs of our customers by achieving faster time-to-market with our advanced solutions."
Speaking of the same project, Owen Flynn, Chief Technology Officer at Equifax, says, "We got to market six months faster, and saw 14 percent in cost savings over Linux, using Windows Server System."
Rapid Return on Investment
The results keep coming in. With the newest supercomputer cluster in place, Equifax has realized significant improvements in real-time performance, decreased mainframe costs, and increased annual savings from reduced support costs. Within 18 months, the Windows-based supercomputer cluster has allowed Equifax to add more computing power at a fraction of the cost. Equifax can easily add nodes as needed to meet increased computational demands and enable faster data processing.
"By migrating to a Windows-based supercomputer cluster, we have saved millions of dollars due to reduced mainframe costs," says Magnotte. "Because our Windows-based supercomputer is only running at 35 percent capacity, I expect we will be moving more operations to it, which should help our mainframe usage savings grow even more. Our legacy mainframe systems can now be leveraged for other business functions."
Increased Scalability
For Equifax, the flexibility of its Windows-based supercomputer clusters makes it easier to incrementally address increased computational demands.
"The Windows supercomputer cluster allows us to add computing power at a fraction of what it costs to purchase a mainframe upgrade," Chappell says. "Instead of dedicating significant resources to upgrade the mainframe, we can add nodes to the supercomputer to process large scores of data, as needed."
En Regal son unos Morones
¿Cambiaron de GNU/Linux a Windows porque no podían darle un update al kernel? ¿Están hablando en serio? ¿Y para minimizar los costos no compró los servicios de RedHat? ¿No consideraron tal vez la posibilidad de utilizar otra distribución? Lo único que evidencia el artículo es que esta gente de Regal son unos morones. CUALQUIER experto en GNU/Linux sabe cómo darle upgrade al kernel. Aparentemente esa decisión de atender los problemas "internamente" era totalmente equivocada. Si los empleados de la compañía no sabían darle un miserable update al kernel, entonces esa decisión fue un costo administrativo, por la decisión tan estúpida de no comprar unos servicios. Y es estupidísimo alegar que los técnicos no supieran donde conseguir los programas correspondientes y los updates. Cuando utilicé RedHat en un momento dado, supe cómo conseguirlo todo. Si yo, que en aquel entonces era un "newbie" en GNU/Linux sabía dónde conseguir los updates, creo que cualquier experto puede buscarlo: ESTÁN POR TODA LA INTERNET. Si yo fuera presidente de Regal hubiera despedido a todos los técnicos por su incompetencia.
Si los costos de mantener RedHat con la compañía RedHat eran demasiado grandes para esa compañía, entonces se pueden buscar otras personas que puedan ofrecer el servicio. La ventaja de GNU/Linux es que tienes libertad de opciones. Hay gente que puede ofrecer servicios a un precio más barato que RedHat.
Ahora Regal considera a Windows Embedded más barato. Deja que comiencen los problemas para que entonces Microsoft y los demás vendedores de software propietario empiecen a cobrarles bueno, a ver si duele tanto o más que cuando se lamentaron instalando RedHat.
Upgrading to Windows 2000 Server Improves Security, Performance,
By standardizing its streaming media infrastructure on Microsoft® Windows® 2000 Server and implementing the Windows 2000 Active Directory directory service, Yahoo Broadcast Solutions increased performance, tightened security, and decreased administrative costs. The improvements in streaming media performance will enable Yahoo Broadcast Solutions to get more out of its existing servers, and will minimize the amount of hardware needed to accommodate future growth. The use of Active Directory Group Policies and Organizational Units to manage servers and user access rights will help to minimize administrative costs, providing a far more efficient means of managing servers than the machine-by-machine adjustments that had to be made in the past. The higher granularity provided by Active Directory in assigning permissions will also help increase security, as will the ability to separate production and non-production environments through the use of multiple Active Directory forests.
Situation
Yahoo Broadcast Solutions is a business unit of Yahoo’s Enterprise Solutions division (http://enterprise.yahoo.com). Its dual mission is to provide a streaming media infrastructure for all of Yahoo, and to provide Internet broadcast services for external corporate customers—a client base that includes Pepsi, Cisco Systems, Texas Instruments, Purina, and General Motors. In the first quarter of 2002, Yahoo Broadcast Solutions’ streaming media infrastructure delivered more than 16 million hours of streaming content per month. Audiences for major events such as the Victoria’s Secret runway show can easily reach several million simultaneous viewers.
Yahoo Broadcast Solutions wanted to optimize its infrastructure to prepare for continued growth. The business unit’s streaming media services are powered by more than 500 dual-processor servers, the majority of which are located in Yahoo’s Dallas, Sunnyvale, London, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan data centers. Until recently, all of these servers were running Microsoft® Windows NT® Server and Microsoft Windows Media™ Services 4.0.
One area that Yahoo Broadcast Solutions wanted to improve was server performance. Greater performance would enable the business unit to do more with its existing servers, and would minimize the number of additional servers needed to accommodate future growth. Keeping the number of servers to a minimum would also help to minimize administrative costs.
Server security was another area where the business unit saw room for improvement. Under the Windows NT domain model, providing operations team members with sufficient permissions required granting local administrator rights on each machine—an unrestricted level of access that left servers more vulnerable than necessary. Maintaining appropriate security under this model was also time-consuming, as changes to permissions had to be made locally on each server.
Yahoo Broadcast Solutions also had a few servers running Linux, which further complicated the company’s ability to maintain a secure environment. “From a systems management perspective, it made sense to standardize on Windows 2000 Server and avoid having to maintain a dual-platform environment that included Linux,” says Darin Divinia, Director of Network Operations at Yahoo Broadcast Solutions. “By standardizing on Windows 2000 Server, we reduced our maintenance costs and created a better administrative environment.”
Standardizing our streaming servers on Windows 2000 Server and rolling out Active Directory has prepared us well for future growth. Not only are we seeing better performance, but we’ve been able to tighten security while decreasing our administrative workload.
Darin Divinia
Director of Network Operations, Yahoo Broadcast Solutions
Solution
To optimize its infrastructure, Yahoo Broadcast Solutions decided to standardize its streaming media servers on the Microsoft platform—specifically Windows 2000 Server—and roll out the Windows 2000 Active Directory service. “Standardizing our streaming servers on Windows 2000 Server and rolling out Active Directory has prepared us well for future growth,” says Divinia. “Not only are we seeing better performance, but we’ve been able to tighten security while decreasing our administrative workload.”
Planning for the Upgrade: A Visit to the Microsoft Technology Center
A key reason for Yahoo Broadcast Solutions’ successful upgrade was a commitment to proper planning. After coming up with a preliminary Active Directory design, four developers and three systems engineers from the company spent a week at the Microsoft Technology Center (MTC) in Austin, Texas. At the center, they worked with Microsoft Consulting Services (MCS) to refine their preliminary Active Directory design and walk through migration scenarios. “I wouldn’t trade our visit to the MTC for anything—it was extremely helpful,” says Jason Hudak, Systems Manager at Yahoo Broadcast Solutions. “We went in with a basic understanding of Active Directory, but working with the experts at MTC showed us that we could get much more granular in locking down our systems. We came out of the center with a better design—simpler and cleaner.”
A Smooth Rollout
Upon returning from the MTC, Yahoo Broadcast Solutions engineers prepped the servers with any necessary BIOS and firmware upgrades. They also created the master disk image that would be used to upgrade the servers. They then began upgrading the servers one data center at a time over the following two months. “One nice thing about Windows 2000 Server is that it includes Windows Media Services,” says Hudak. “Unlike Windows NT, there was no need to install the component separately after the operating system upgrade—we just flipped a switch in the disk image. In the end, we were able to upgrade each server in just 25-30 minutes. The entire process went very smoothly, with no issues.”
Benefits
Yahoo Broadcast Solutions’ upgrade to Windows 2000 delivered all the expected benefits: better server performance, tighter security, and a lower administrative workload. These will all increase the business unit’s ability to accommodate future growth.
Better Performance = Lower Hardware Costs
At the Microsoft Technology Center, Yahoo had the chance to measure differences in streaming media performance between Windows NT Server and Windows 2000 Server. As illustrated in Table 1, upgrading to Windows 2000 Server with Windows Media Services 4.1 delivered better CPU utilization across the entire range of workloads. These improvements will enable Yahoo Broadcast Solutions to get more out of its existing servers, and will help to minimize the number of servers that need to be purchased in the future.
MEDIA Bit Rate Streams CPU Utilization
Windows NT 4.0 Windows 2000
Audio 28.8 kbps 1000 2.12% 0.42%
56 kbps 750 3.07% 0.51%
Video 100 kbps 500 10.01% 5.13%
300 kbps 300 16.18% 10.57%
700 kbps 200 19.37% 13.02%
Table 1: Streaming media performance under Windows NT Server and Windows 2000 Server, as measured by Yahoo Broadcast Solutions at the Microsoft Technology Center using Windows Media load simulators. All tests were conducted on Dell PowerEdge 1550 servers with two 1GHz Pentium III processors and 1 GB RAM.
Active Directory Helps Deliver Tighter Security and a Lower Administrative Workload
Through the use of Active Directory Group Policies, Yahoo Broadcast Solutions is now able to lock down its production servers much more tightly. Instead of giving everyone tasked with performing maintenance on the servers full administrative rights, each person can be granted only the permissions needed to perform the task at hand—such as updating drivers, completing backups, or adding content. “Active Directory is much cleaner and neater than a Windows NT domain,” says Hudak. “As a result, we’re able to lock down our servers more effectively and grant access privileges with a significantly higher degree of granularity.”
Unlike before, Yahoo Broadcast Solutions’ production infrastructure resides in a separate domain from the company’s non-production infrastructure. “Segregating the non-production environment from an Internet-connected production environment through the use of separate Active Directory forests increases security for both environments,” says Bryan Kreitz, a Microsoft Technology Center consultant. “Where business requirements dictate, a non-transitive trust between the two domain structures can be implemented.”
With Active Directory in place, Yahoo Broadcast Solutions can leverage Organizational Units and Group Policies to centralize server administration. Changes to adjust permissions no longer need to be made on multiple machines, but can be accomplished by simply adjusting a single Group Policy through a centralized administrative console. “Implementing Active Directory provides a foundation for centrally managing the migration of our remaining servers to Windows 2000 Server and the new domain structure,” said Hudak. “Managing our environment through the use of Active Directory group policies based on machine function and user roles will help improve security and reduce the administrative costs associated with managing our production environment.”
podria ser demandado
yo no compraria un software que podria ser demandado mucho menos una empresa y eso es una realidad
ya es hora de despertar
Y Por que tus links sirven y los que dicen que microsoft es mejor no sirven.Eres una fanatico de linux y no puedes dar opinion neutral y alo que me referia de lso packetes es eso mismo que para que sirvan ahi que hacer algo extra moron ,yo uso linux.y no es irrelevante como se escriba me importa un comino si lo unico que sabes es atacar por escribir pues whatever.Por que lo entendistes y por que lo contestaste??????????
Ademas lo mismo que dice de linux tu lo llevo oyendo hace casi veinte años.
linux tiene su mercado pero obviamente el mercado que tiene microsoft es el que tiene el dinero.
casi 20 años soñando ya es hora de despertar
ademas todos saben que microsoft tiene un lab de linux para dominar a algo tienes que saber como corre no como ustedes que no saben como corre microsoft y menus linux ya que tiene miles de versiones
. Los links ahi unos que son ciertos y eso ya lo sabia pero mira en el futuro lo que va a pasar.Microsoft aprende de sus errores ya y linux sigue siempre en lo mismo.ademas no tengo tiempo para perder escribiendo ortografia eso se lo dejo a ti que tienes el tiempo para idolatrar a linux lol.
Hablando de Fanáticos
Esos links de Microsoft sí funcionaban en el momento que escribieron su anuncio de que querían especialistas en manejo de GNU/Linux.
En cuanto a lo demás, no tienes respuesta en lo absoluto a las tremendas metidas de pata que has hecho durante esta discusión. A fin de cuentas, si a ti no te importa el sistema operativo GNU/Linux, ¿qué estás haciendo aquí discutiendo el tema con nosotros? ¿No será que como fanático de Microsoft que eres le tienes mucho miedo a que nosotros seamos una verdadera alternativa? ¿No será tal vez que Microsoft está haciendo mixión en sus pantalones ante la realidad de que los gobiernos, las universidades, las grandes compañías, centros comerciales, restauranes, establecimientos, etc. están todos viendo a GNU/Linux como una verdadera alternativa? Y oye, lo que me da autoridad para hablar del tema es que yo antes era un usuario de Windows, y todos mis programas eran propietarios. La realidad fue que con Microsoft tuve mil problemas, y otros problemas serios cuando Microsoft equivocadamente parecía atribuírme a mí una piratería de música que nunca llevé a cabo. Windows, contrario a GNU/Linux, espía en sus usuarios, y puede llegar a "false positives" que llevan a atribuir al usuario cosas que nunca ha hecho. Por lo tanto sé cómo opera Microsoft, y sé cómo operan las distribuciones.
Con GNU/Linux gané mucho más: estabilidad, libertad para hacer con mi computadora lo que yo realmente quisiera, ahorrarme mucho dinero en software, compartir software con amistades, ayudar a otros y que otros me ayudaran, etc. Nada de esto lo experimenté en lo absoluto con Windows y sus programas. Una vez más, para mí, el hecho de que Windows tenga la mayoría del mercado es irrelevante. A veces veo amigos, e incluso compañías, gastar dinero excesivamente en licencias que son malas para ellos. En muchas ocasiones les aconsejo que cambien, pero como ellos están en la mentalidad de que "lo caro en cantidad significa que es bueno en calidad", dejo que metan la pata mil veces antes de que se den cuenta de su error. De esas pesadillas es que Microsoft hace dinero.
En cuanto a tu manera de escribir: sí, entendí lo que quisiste decir.... después de media hora tratando de averiguar lo que querías decir. Hubiera sido más fácil para mí (y me imagino para muchos lectores) que hubieras escrito bien. Sin embargo, como no quieres hacerlo, ése es tu problema. Espero en Dios que nunca estés en una posición de presentar algún trabajo escrito en una universidad o un empleo, sin que al menos aprendas un mínimo de gramática y ortografía; porque tu manera de escribir deja mucho qué desear. A veces la forma de escribir revela cuán confundida está una persona. Si eso es cierto, estás super-confundido.
Microsoft aprende de sus errores ... bien tarde. Ése es siempre el problema de los monopolios. En el caso de software libre, desgraciadamente, no tienes la evidencia de que "siempre están con lo mismo", porque como el código es abierto a todos, todos contribuyen a la mejoría. Eso incluye el arreglar bugs del software, y hacerlo uno más seguro. En el mundo de software libre hay un verdadero aprendizaje de corregir errores. En Microsoft no, Microsoft sólo depende de sus empleados para corregir aparentes errores y dejar de corregir otros verdaderos errores (aquéllos que sean convenientes a esa compañía). En el caso de software libre, está el beneficio de que TODO EL MUNDO puede corregir los errores, porque se pueden ver los errores y corregirse. Así que GNU/Linux es mi sistema operativo por ese motivo.
Y no soy fanático. Si aparece algo mejor que GNU/Linux, y a la vez me garantiza todas mis libertades como usuario, estoy en la disposición de cambiar. Incluso estoy abierto a la posibilidad de que si Microsoft mañana libera a Windows como software libre, y hace algo de mucha mejor calidad que la porquería de Windows que tiene, posiblemente yo lo adopte denuevo. Pero nada de eso me ha hecho falta, estoy bien como estoy :D
bla bla bla
Ni tan siquiera lei todo para saber que es la misma shit que siempre escriben ,pa empezar en donde es eso lol casi no se ve donde usan linux son pocos sitios comparados con los demas siguen siendo outcast.y bla bla bla el software libre contiene codigos de otros software mejor dicho copiados pero ustedes dicen mejorados y las empresas que dices que no te hacen caso es simple ellos no escuchan a ideas que no funcionan entiende ya que linux funciona en algunas cosas pero en otras es una porqueria pero en donde funciona lo hace muy bien todas las compañias quieren soluciones disponibles para todos sus problemas que sean faciles de implementar y que tenga soporte.ademas no es mi problema que tu no sepas usar windows y tengas esa opinion lol.que errores hablas todos los programas dan errores unos mas que otros y eso depende mucho de la implementacion del mismo y del staff.ademas me es indiferente como escriba aqui y lo que pienses mucho menos que infieras que no se escribir cuando tan siquiera sabes usar windows y eso lo puedo usar cualquier nerdo con un training de una hora ,en cuanto a linux no puede ser de esa manera por que todos saben que no es asi y punto por eso es que es outcast.asi que cuando contestes a esto si lo haces lo vas a hacer con otro blablabla que no va a ser diferente a ninguna respuesta que siempre dan lo que es resumido en esto:
linux es mejor
software libre es mejor
no virus
gratis
La realidad:
linux no es muy bueno todavia para un desktop
software libre huele a demanda estabien para usarlo en la casa no company wise a menos que estes en quiebra como venezuela cuba ect o seas pais comunista.
cuantos reportes de bugs de linux as leido parece que ninguno pues tu linux esta vulnerable si no sabes tan siquiera sus debilidades
gratis ??? esto es relativo si eres new user tienes que tomar clases para usarlo eso es si no eres tech savy.o comprar libros o meterte en los frikin foros.en verdad no es muy comodo cuando sepas que bajaste una aplicacion para debian y tienes red hat pero decia que era pa linux y tienes que usar alien para cambiar formato y despues instalar por command prompt y si no sabes y haces esto leyendo foros no vas a poder ni correr la instalacion ni saber donde se instalo lol eso es linux y no soy fanatico por que yo lo uso tambien y uso debian flavors y red hat flavors y slackware flavors y gentoo flavors y alguno que otro que e usado que no se sabe de que car@j.. es el flavor de tantos que hay sin estandar esto siempre va a estar igual linux esta en donde empezo en el mismo sitio y si quieres que te ponga comas y puntos y bla bla es lo mismo que escribir en un foro siguiendo gramatica para que si comoquiera te tardas en entender jajajaja o si lo entiendes te vas a negacion y vas a ripostar es un circulo viciosoeres te sientes como rechazado por la sociedad y te vas en contra de ella como los goticos lol.
baboso
En todo ese reguerro de lineas no argumentas nada concreto, no seas tan baboso lol la realidad de todo es que Linux cada dia esta mejor y entrando en mercados nuevos y recibiendo el apoyo de las grandes corporaciones. Para buen entendedor con pocas palabras basta baboso.
whatever
eso dicen desde hace casi veinte años siempre lo mismo.como si el mercado de microsft estubiera estancado el de linux crece y el de microsot tambien.
No es por nada.... pero, creo
No es por nada.... pero, creo que nuestro amigo prosario_2000 estaba siendo sarcastico, estoy seguro que el esta muy bien educado al respecto. Asi que, relax... respira hondo... ya paso.
-jvd
y...
y a quien le importan tus comentarios tan incoherentes e ignorantes? :)
a ti bobin
parece que a ti te importan pues te tomastes el tiempo en responder el mensaje.
necio
wow
Wow... ya era hora.